CFA L1 | Corporate Issuers
LM1: Corporate Structures and Ownerships
Business Structures
Understanding business structures is essential for evaluating risk, taxation, control, and financing options.
1. Sole Proprietorship
- One owner; owner = operator
- Unlimited liability
- No separate legal identity
- All profits belong to the owner
- Taxed once as personal income
- Limited by owner’s capital & risk appetite
Analogy:
Like a single-person food truck — you run everything, keep all profit, but also bear all the risk.
2. General Partnership
- Two or more owners share control
- No separate legal identity
- Partners share unlimited liability
- Profits shared
- Taxed once (personal income)
- Limited by partners’ combined capital and risk appetite
Analogy:
Like two people co-owning a small bakery — both share profits and losses fully.
3. Limited Partnership (LP)
- Must include at least one General Partner (GP) with full control
- Limited Partners (LPs) → limited liability, limited control
- Profits shared based on contribution (GP usually more)
- Taxed once
Analogy:
GP = driver of a car
LP = passengers providing funding but limited responsibility.
4. Corporation (LLC / Inc.)
- Separate legal identity
- Can hire employees, sign contracts
- Owners = shareholders and bondholders
- Board of Directors handles governance
- Limited liability for owners
- Taxation: Double taxation (corporate + personal dividends)
- Easiest to raise capital (equity + debt)
Corporations reduce investor risk because owners cannot lose more than they invested.
Analogy:
Corporations are like cruise ships — large, regulated, and with many passengers (owners) who are not the captain.
Public vs Private Companies
Public Companies
- Listed & traded on exchange
- Highly liquid trading
- Share price changes with trading activity
- Heavy disclosure requirements
Private Companies
- Not exchange-traded
- Low liquidity
- Requires negotiation for share transfers
- Fewer investors, longer holding periods
- Higher potential returns due to higher risk
Share Issuance Differences
Public:
- Can issue new shares easily after listing
Private:
- Rely on private placements → fewer investors, smaller amounts
Registration & Disclosure Requirements
Public Firms:
- Must register with regulators
- Extensive financial reporting
- Information becomes publicly available
Private Firms:
- No obligation to provide full public disclosures
- Still must disclose key non-financial info
How Companies Go Public
1. IPO (Initial Public Offering)
- Underwriter involved
- Company sells new shares to public
2. Direct Listing
- No underwriter
- No new capital raised
- Existing shares simply begin trading
3. Acquisition
- Private company acquired by public company
4. SPAC (Special Purpose Acquisition Company)
- “Blank check” company raises money → buys private company
- If no deal executed, funds returned
Analogy:
SPAC = shopping mall gift card — the shell company exists purely to buy something later.
Going Back to Private: Leveraged Buyout (LBO)
- Investors borrow heavily to acquire a public firm
- Belief the public market undervalued the company
Added Explanation:
LBOs create high leverage, but allow operational restructuring outside public scrutiny.
Corporate Life Cycle
Startup
- Low/no revenue
- Negative cash flow
- High risk
- Limited financing options
Growth
- Revenue ↑
- Cash flow ↑
- Still may be unprofitable
- Often seek public listing
Maturity
- Revenue steady, positive
- Strong cash flow
- Low risk
- Easier to obtain financing
Decline
- Revenue ↓
- Cash flow ↓
- Business risk ↑
- Difficult to obtain capital
Analogy:
Just like people: childhood → adolescence → adulthood → old age.
Lenders vs Owners
Debtholders (Bondholders)
- First claim on cash flows & assets
- Fixed payments (interest + principal)
- Lower risk, lower required return
- Prefer stability
Shareholders
- Dividends discretionary
- Last in priority
- Higher risk, higher potential return
- Elect board of directors
Investor Perspective: Bonds vs Shares
| Aspect | Bonds | Shares |
|---|---|---|
| Return Potential | Limited | Unlimited |
| Max Loss | Initial investment | Initial investment |
| Risk | Lower | Higher |
| Key Interest | Timely repayment | Net assets – liabilities |
Company Perspective: Debt vs Equity
| Category | Debt (Bonds) | Equity (Shares) |
|---|---|---|
| Cost of Capital | Lower (tax-deductible interest) | Higher |
| Risk to Company | Higher leverage risk | Lower (no forced payments) |
| Attractiveness | Ideal when cash flows steady | Ideal when unpredictable CF |
| Dilution | None | Yes |
Analogy:
Debt = taking a mortgage (lower cost but must pay)
Equity = taking on a roommate (higher cost long-term but no obligation to pay monthly)
Summary Table
| Topic | Key Points |
|---|---|
| Business Structures | Liability & taxation differ greatly |
| Public vs Private | Public more liquid, more disclosure |
| Going Public | IPO, direct listing, SPAC, acquisition |
| Corporate Life Cycle | Startup → Growth → Maturity → Decline |
| Investors | Bondholders lower risk; shareholders higher upside |
| Issuer Perspective | Debt: cheap but risky; Equity: expensive but flexible |
Key Takeaways
- Liability is the biggest differentiator in business structures.
- Public companies offer liquidity but face heavy reporting rules.
- SPACs are acquisition vehicles; they don’t operate businesses.
- Corporations are preferred for raising large amounts of capital.
- Debt is cheaper for firms (tax shield) but increases financial risk.
- Equity avoids default risk but dilutes ownership.
- Lifecycle stage influences financing strategy and valuation.
LM2: Intro to Corporate Governance and Other ESG Considerations
Stakeholder Groups
A stakeholder is anyone with a vested interest in the company.
Shareholders
- Want value maximization, profit growth
- Can elect the board, influence decisions
- Non-profits do not have shareholders, but have similar oversight groups
Analogy:
Shareholders are like team owners in sports — they fund the team and expect winning results.
Creditors
Banks or lenders who want principal + interest repaid.
Two Types of Creditors:
- Private lenders (banks): access non-public info, more flexible
- Public lenders (bondholders): rely on public info & credit ratings
Analogy:
Private lenders = a friend lending money
Public lenders = a bank giving you a loan with strict rules.
Board of Directors
Elected by shareholders to represent shareholder interests.
Key duties:
- Strategic decisions
- Hire/fire CEO
- Monitor management
Types of Directors
- Inside Directors: managers, founders, major shareholders
- Independent Directors: no significant compensation/relationship
Staggered Board
Only part of board is elected each year → makes hostile takeovers more difficult.
Managers
- Execute board strategy
- Want to maximize total compensation (salary + bonuses + stock options)
Employees
- Care about compensation, benefits, stability, career growth
Customers
Expect quality products/services and post-sale support
Suppliers
Want timely payments & long-term contracts
Regulators
Protect the public and economy; collect taxes
Theories of Corporate Governance
Shareholder Theory
Prioritize shareholder value only
Stakeholder Theory
Balance interests of all stakeholders
Analogy:
Shareholder theory = “maximize profit”
Stakeholder theory = “profit + people + planet”
Principal-Agent Relationship
A principal hires an agent to act on their behalf → interests may not align.
Main Conflict:
Shareholders (owners) vs Managers (agents)
Why? → Asymmetric Information
Managers know more about operations than shareholders.
Tools to Align Interests:
- Compensation tied to shares/options
But it can fail due to:
- Entrenchment – long-tenured managers become “untouchable”
- Empire Building – managers pursue unnecessary growth
- Excessive Risk Taking – to boost option value
Controlling vs Minority Shareholders
- Controlling shareholders → concentrated ownership
- Minority shareholders → dispersed ownership
Voting Systems
- Straight voting: 1 share = 1 vote
- Dual class shares: Voting power ≠ ownership %
Added Explanation:
Dual-class structures often give founders more control (e.g., tech companies).
Shareholders vs Creditors
- Shareholders want risk-taking for higher returns
- Creditors want stability
- Conflicts increase with longer-maturity debt
- Creditors protect themselves using covenants
Analogy:
Shareholders = thrill-seekers
Creditors = safety inspectors
Corporate Governance Mechanisms
Shareholder Mechanisms
- Reporting & Transparency
- Shareholder Meetings (annual or extraordinary)
- Proxy Voting → vote on someone’s behalf
- Shareholder Activism
- Shareholder Lawsuits
- Corporate Takeovers
- Proxy contest
- Tender offer
- Hostile takeover
Creditor Mechanisms
- Bond Indentures
- Covenants (restrict leverage, dividends)
- Periodic Reporting
- Creditor Committees (bankruptcy/restructuring)
Board Mechanisms
Audit Committee
- Monitors financial reporting, oversees internal & external audits
Governance Committee
- Develops governance policies
Remuneration Committee
- Sets executive compensation
Nomination Committee
- Handles director selection
Risk Committee
- Manages enterprise risk & risk appetite
Investment Committee
- Reviews major investments
Employee Mechanisms
- Labor laws
- Employment contracts
Customer & Supplier Mechanisms
- Contracts
- Social media feedback
Government Mechanisms
- Regulations
- Governance codes
- Legal systems
- Civil Law – laws created by legislature
- Common Law – laws from legislature + judges
Key Insights:
Common Law systems favour stronger shareholder and creditor protection.
Risks of Poor Governance
Operational Risks
- Weak controls → fraud
- Poor decision-making
- Excessive or insufficient risk-taking
Financial Risks
- Default
- Bankruptcy
Benefits of Good Governance
- Higher efficiency
- Better performance
- Lower default risk → lower cost of debt
- Higher valuation
ESG Investing
Growing importance as ESG affects risk, valuation, and future cash flows.
Environmental Issues
Climate change, pollution, biodiversity, deforestation, energy efficiency, waste management, water scarcity
Social Issues
Customer satisfaction, diversity, worker safety, human rights
Governance Issues
Board structure, audit quality, corruption, shareholder rights, political influence
Incorporating ESG in Investment Analysis
Equity Investors
- Identify upside & downside risk
- Adjust valuation models, scenario testing
Fixed Income Investors
- Identify default risk
- Measure relative value, spreads, duration
ESG Investment Approaches
Responsible Investing
Broad: using ESG to avoid negative consequences
Sustainable Investing
Choosing companies using ESG to create value
Socially Responsible (SRI)
Aligns investments with ethical or religious values
Negative Screening
Exclude bad ESG actors
Positive Screening
Select strong ESG performers
ESG Integration
Blend ESG with traditional analysis
Thematic Investing
Focus on themes → clean energy, water, etc.
Active Ownership
Engage management to achieve ESG goals
Impact Investing
Intentionally invest to create measurable positive impact
Summary Table
| Topic | Key Points |
|---|---|
| Stakeholders | Shareholders, creditors, customers, employees, regulators |
| Theories | Shareholder vs stakeholder theory |
| Conflicts | Principal-agent issues, risk preferences |
| Governance Tools | Reporting, meetings, voting, activism, committees |
| Legal Systems | Common law gives stronger investor protection |
| ESG Issues | Environmental, social, governance categories |
| ESG Strategies | Screening, integration, thematic, impact investing |
Key Takeaways
Common Law systems provide the strongest shareholder & creditor protections.
Corporate governance manages conflicts between shareholders, creditors, managers, and stakeholders.
Asymmetric information creates principal-agent problems.
Board committees play specific, testable roles (audit, governance, nomination, risk).
Shareholder activism & proxy voting are important governance tools.
ESG integration is becoming standard in both equity and fixed income analysis.
Negative vs. positive screening is frequently tested.
LM3: Business Models and Risks
Business Models
A business model explains how a company creates value:
- Who it sells to
- What it sells
- Where it sells
- How it prices
Analogy:
A business model is like a recipe — ingredients (products), target eater (customers), kitchen location (channels), and price for the dish.
Profitability
Understand margins, breakeven, and unit economics.
Business Model Types
- Producing goods
- Providing services
- Financial services
Business Model Innovation
Technology changed:
- Where goods are sold
- How they are delivered
- Marketing channels
- Outsourcing ease
Network Effects
Product becomes more valuable as more users join
Example: social media
Variations of Business Models
Private Label:
Goods produced by one firm → sold under another’s brand
Licensing Arrangements:
Royalties paid to use brand
Value-Added Resellers:
Add installation, customization, support
E-commerce Models
- Affiliate marketing (commissions)
- Marketplace (buyers + sellers)
- Aggregators (Uber, Spotify)
- Platforms (network-based)
- Hybrid models (Tesla: cars + charging network)
Value Proposition: Who, What, Where, How Much
Target Customers (Who?)
- Geography
- Market segments
- Customer segments
- B2B vs B2C
Product / Service Offering (What?)
- What the company sells
- What differentiates it (price, quality, innovation)
- What customer need is satisfied
Differentiation drives pricing power; low differentiation leads to commodity pricing.
Channel Strategy (Where?)
- Direct, intermediaries, digital, omnichannel
- Activities: service, display, inquiries, order processing
- Assets: warehouses, retail stores, reps, website
- Firms involved: wholesalers, retailers, agents, franchisees
Traditional Flow:
Manufacturer → Wholesaler → Retailer → End Customer
Analogy:
Channels are like roads leading products from factory to customers.
Pricing Strategy (How Much?)
Pricing Levels
- Premium
- Parity
- Discount
Assess:
- Differentiation level
- Whether price is justified
Pricing Power
- Price taker → must sell at market price
- Price setter → can set higher/lower prices
Pricing Models
Value-Based Pricing
Price set based on customer-perceived value
Analogy:
A concert ticket costs more for a famous artist even if costs are the same.
Cost-Based Pricing
Price set based on cost + margin
Price Discrimination
Charging different customers different prices
Analogy:
Senior/student discounts → same product, different price.
Tiered Pricing
Volume-based discounts
Dynamic Pricing
Price changes based on time, demand
Analogy:
Airline tickets rising as the departure date nears.
Auction-Based Pricing
Pricing through competitive bidding
Multiple-Product Pricing
Bundling
Sell products together
Razor–Blades Model
Cheap base product; expensive refills – think printers and ink refills
Optional Product Pricing
Extra add-ons at sale or later
Rapid Growth Pricing
Penetration Pricing
Lower margins initially to gain market share
Freemium
Free basic tier, pay for premium
Hidden Revenue Models
“Free” product → revenue from ads, data
Examples: Google, social media
Alternatives to Full Ownership
Subscription Pricing
Customer rents product as long as needed
Fractionalization
Asset divided into time/units (e.g., timeshares)
Licensing
Royalty payments for using intangible assets
Franchising
Rights to sell product in a territory
Value Chain
Describes activities within the company that add value.
Steps:
- Identify activities
- Estimate value added + cost
- Identify competitive advantage
Analogy:
A value chain is like a factory assembly line — each step adds value toward the final product.
Macro, Business & Financial Risk
Firms face external, industry-level, and firm-specific risks.
External (Macro) Risk
Includes:
- GDP growth
- Inflation
- Interest rates
- Unemployment
- Demographics (aging, immigration, labor shortages)
- Sector demand: cyclicality
- Industry costs: fixed vs variable
- Political/legal environment
- Social trends
Analogy:
Macro risk = weather conditions a pilot cannot control.
Business Risk
Industry-Specific Risk
Earnings Cyclicality: High for discretionary/durable goods
Industry Structure
Low concentration → lower margins
Competitive Intensity
Measured through ROIC, EBIT/Revenue
Porter’s 5 Forces
- Buyers
- Suppliers
- Current competitors
- New entrants
- Substitutes
Growth & Innovation
Depends on industry maturity
Firm-Specific Risk
Competitive Risk
Losing market share; depends on:
- Pricing power
- Barriers to entry
- Disruption level
Product-Market Risk
Product may fail to meet demand
Execution Risk
Management may underdeliver
Capital Investment Risk
Poor investment decisions
ESG Risk
Failure to meet environmental/social/governance expectations
Financial Risk
Comes from capital structure (debt levels).
Key points:
- More debt = higher default risk
- Firms with low business risk can take more debt
Measuring Risk: Total Leverage
\text{Total Leverage} = \text{Operating Leverage} + \text{Financial Leverage}
Operating Leverage
- Comes from fixed operating costs
- Higher fixed costs → EBIT more sensitive to sales
Financial Leverage
- Comes from interest obligations
- Higher interest → net income more sensitive to EBIT
Analogy:
Operating leverage = treadmill incline
Financial leverage = extra weight in your backpack
Both increase the difficulty (risk).
Solutions to Reduce Risk
Asset-Light Models
Ownership of assets transferred to others
Lean Startups
Operate with minimal fixed costs
Pay-in-Advance Models
Reduce need for working capital
Summary Table
| Topic | Key Points |
|---|---|
| Business Models | Who/What/Where/How Much define value proposition |
| Pricing | Value-based, cost-based, dynamic, freemium |
| Channels | Direct, indirect, digital, omnichannel |
| Value Chain | Identify activities → estimate value → find advantage |
| Innovation | Digital shifts + network effects |
| Macro Risk | Economic, political, social trends |
| Business Risk | Industry structure, competition, firm execution |
| Financial Risk | Debt structure, leverage |
| Risk Mitigation | Asset-light, lean, prepayment |
Key Takeaways
- A business model describes how value is created and captured.
- Pricing power depends on differentiation and competitive landscape.
- Industry analysis requires understanding structure, cyclicality, and value chains.
- Firm-specific risks include competition, product fit, execution, and ESG issues.
- Financial risk rises with leverage; operating leverage amplifies business cycles.
- Asset-light and lean models reduce risk by limiting fixed-cost exposure.
LM4: Capital Investments
Type of Capital Investment
1. Going-Concern Projects
Required to continue business operations.
Examples:
- Machine replacement (saves costs but doesn’t increase revenue)
- Efficiency upgrades
Important:
Finance should match asset life → long-lived asset → long-term debt.
2. Regulatory / Compliance Projects
Required by government or regulators.
- High costs
- If unaffordable → company may shut down
- If affordable → creates barrier to entry
3. Expansion Projects
Add new products/services or acquisitions.
- High uncertainty
- Large capital requirement
4. Other Projects
Entering new industries, new technology, innovation.
- High risk, experimental
Capital Allocation: Capital Budgeting Process
Capital budgeting = evaluation of long-term investments
4 Steps
- Idea Generation
- Investment Analysis
- Capital Allocation Planning
- Monitoring & Post-Audit
Five Principles of Capital Budgeting
1. Base decisions on cash flows, not accounting income
- Accounting income includes non-cash items (depreciation)
- CF = real inflows/outflows
Analogy:
Accounting income is like a report card; cash flows are the actual money in your bank.
2. Use Incremental Cash Flows
Which cash flows change because of the project?
3. Timing Matters (Discounting)
Cash today > cash tomorrow
4. Use After-Tax Cash Flows
Taxes affect real CF
5. Ignore Financing Costs in CFs
Interest costs included in the discount rate (WACC), not CF.
Key Terms in Capital Budgeting
Sunk Costs
Already spent → ignored
Analogy:
Like paying for a bad movie — money is gone; don’t force yourself to stay.
Externalities
Impact a new project has on existing operations.
Includes cannibalization: Introducing a new iPhone reduces sales of older models.
Conventional vs Unconventional Cash Flows
- Conventional: only one sign change
- Unconventional: multiple sign changes → IRR problems
Mutually Exclusive Projects
Choose one option only
Project Sequencing
Some projects depend on others’ success
NPV & IRR
NPV (Net Present Value)
- Positive NPV → accept
- Measures dollar value added to firm
IRR (Internal Rate of Return)
Discount rate that makes NPV = 0
- If IRR > required return → accept
Analogy:
IRR is the project’s “interest rate.”
NPV vs IRR
Independent Projects
NPV & IRR agree
Mutually Exclusive Projects
NPV & IRR may conflict → choose higher NPV
Why conflict?
- Differences in project size
- Differences in timing of cash flows
Unconventional Cash Flows
- IRR may have multiple IRRs
- NPV always reliable
Pros & Cons
NPV Pros
- Directly measures value creation
- Assumes reinvestment at required rate of return (realistic)
NPV Cons
- Does not reflect project scale
IRR Pros
- Easy to compare to required return
- Expressed as a % (intuitive)
IRR Cons
- Assumes reinvestment at IRR
- Can conflict with NPV
- Fails with unconventional CF
Capital Allocation Pitfalls
- Inertia: budget tied to previous year
- Source-of-capital bias: internal funds seen as free
- Not considering alternatives
- Pet Projects: leadership bias
- Using accounting metrics instead of CF
- Forecasting errors
How Capital Allocation Adds Value
ROIC vs Cost of Capital
- If ROIC > cost of capital → value increases
- If ROIC < cost of capital → value decreases
NPV & Stock Price
Positive NPV should increase stock price proportionally,
but markets respond to expectations, not just fundamentals.
Inflation Effects
- Nominal CF include inflation
- Real CF exclude inflation
- Use nominal rate with nominal CF
- Higher inflation:
- Reduces margins
- Lowers tax shield from depreciation
Real Options
Real options give managers flexibility to adjust investment decisions.
4 Types of Real Options:
1. Timing Option
Delay investment until better info available
2. Sizing Option
Expand or abandon depending on performance
3. Flexibility Option
Adjust pricing or operations
4. Fundamental Option
Project itself behaves like an option (e.g., R&D)
How to Value Real Options
Three approaches:
- DCF (basic)
- If NPV negative:
- Decision Trees
- Option Pricing Models (e.g., Black-Scholes)
Summary Table
| Topic | Key Points |
|---|---|
| Capital Investment Types | Going-concern, regulatory, expansion, innovation |
| Capital Budgeting | Evaluate long-term projects using CF |
| Key Principles | Incremental, after-tax, timing, ignore financing |
| NPV | Best value measure |
| IRR | % return but unreliable for unconventional CF |
| Value Creation | ROIC > cost of capital |
| Risks | Inflation, forecasting errors |
| Real Options | Timing, sizing, flexibility, fundamental |
Key Takeaways
- Cash flow—not accounting income—is the foundation of capital budgeting.
- Ignore sunk costs; include cannibalization and externalities.
- NPV is superior to IRR for mutually exclusive or unconventional CF projects.
- ROIC vs WACC determines value creation.
- Inflation affects both cash flows and discount rates.
- Real options add significant value by giving managers flexibility.
LM5: Working Capital & Liquidity
Working Capital Management
Working Capital = Current Assets – Current Liabilities
Goal:
- Ensure the company can meet daily operational needs
- But avoid holding excess idle assets
Analogy:
Working capital is like the gas in your car — too little and you stall; too much and you’re carrying unnecessary weight.
Components of Working Capital
Current Assets
- Accounts receivable
- Inventory
- Short-term investments (marketable securities)
Current Liabilities
- Accounts payable
- Short-term debt
Internal Methods to Improve Working Capital
- Generate more operating cash flow
- Shorten the cash conversion cycle
- Convert liquid assets into cash
Cash conversion cycle = amount of time between paying suppliers and collecting cash from customers.
Short-Term Financing Methods
1. After-Tax Operating CF
Analogy:
Think of this as cash generated internally before seeking external financing.
2. Accounts Payable
What suppliers are owed.
Example credit term: 2/10 net 40 → 2% discount if paid in 10 days; otherwise due in 40 days.
3. Accounts Receivable
Money customers owe.
Higher receivables → weaker working capital unless collections improve.
4. Inventory
Must balance stock availability vs. holding cost.
5. Marketable Securities
Short-term investments easily converted to cash.
Financing Through Intermediaries
Uncommitted Lines of Credit
- Bank is not obligated to lend
- Least reliable
Committed Lines of Credit
Reliable; formal agreement
Revolving Credit Facility
Multi-year committed line; best short-term funding tool
Secured Loans
Collateral required
Factoring
Sell receivables at a discount for immediate cash
Analogy:
Factoring is like selling a concert ticket for less than face value because you need cash today.
Web-Based / Non-Bank Lenders
Quick approval but usually higher cost
Capital Markets Funding
Commercial Paper
- Short-term debt issued by large, well-rated companies
- Low cost
Long-Term Options
- Public or private debt
- Hybrid securities (preferred, convertibles)
- Common equity
- Leasing
Determining Working Capital Needs
Three factors:
- Inventory needs
- Receivables (as a % of sales)
- Payables (as a % of sales)
Working Capital Approaches
1. Conservative Approach
- Holds more current assets
- Finances with long-term debt or equity
Pros
- Stable, permanent financing
- Reduced rollover risk
- Higher flexibility in stress periods
- Certainty of WC availability
Cons
- High financing costs
- Long lead time
- Less ability to “borrow as needed”
- Long-term debt covenants
Analogy:
Like keeping a large emergency fund—very safe but costly.
2. Aggressive Approach
- Holds fewer current assets
- Uses short-term debt and payables
Pros
- Lower financing costs
- Borrow only when needed
- Can refinance when rates fall
Cons
- Higher rollover risk
- Short-term funding volatility
- Must maintain tight credit control
Analogy:
Running your car with near-empty tank — cheaper, but risk of running out.
3. Moderate Approach
- Matches duration:
- Permanent WC → long-term debt
- Variable WC → short-term debt
Pros
- Lower cost than conservative
- Flexibility for seasonal spikes
- Diversified funding sources
Cons
- Still has short-term rollover risk
- May rely on trade credit
Analogy:
Like keeping moderate gas in the tank — safe but still efficient
Sources & Management of Liquidity
Definition
- Liquidity: ability to meet short-term obligations
- Liquidity Management: ability to generate cash at low cost
Primary Sources of Liquidity
- Free cash flows
- Cash balances
- Short-term funds (trade credit, credit lines, short-term investments)
Secondary Sources of Liquidity
- Renegotiating debt terms
- Liquidating assets
- Filing for bankruptcy protection
Added Explanation:
These are used only when the firm is under financial stress.
Liquidity
Factors Affecting Liquidity
Pulls on Liquidity (accelerate outflows)
- Paying suppliers early
- Suppliers reducing credit limits
- Restrictions on credit lines
- Low initial liquidity
Drags on Liquidity (slow inflows)
- Slow receivables collection
- Obsolete inventory
- Tight credit environment
Analogy:
Pulls = water leaking from a bucket
Drags = water flowing slowly into it
Measuring Liquidity
Current Ratio
Quick Ratio (Acid Test)
Cash Ratio
Short Term Borrowing
Short-Term Funding Objectives
- Handle peak cash needs
- Maintain diversified credit sources
- Borrow at cost-effective rates
- Consider all explicit & implicit costs
Factors in Short-Term Borrowing
- Firm size & creditworthiness
- Legal/regulatory environment
- Asset quality (collateral availability)
- Flexibility across maturities
Borrowing Strategies
Passive Strategy
- Minimal planning
- Rely on one source
- Roll over continuously
Active Strategy
- More planning, diversified structure
- Matching strategy: loan payments match cash receipts
- Avoids rollover trap
Analogy:
Matching strategy = scheduling your loan payments right after payday so you never fall behind.
Summary Table
| Topic | Key Points |
|---|---|
| WC Components | AR, inventory, investments vs AP, short-term debt |
| Short-Term Funding | Credit lines, factoring, commercial paper |
| WC Approaches | Conservative, aggressive, moderate |
| Liquidity Measures | Current, quick, cash ratios |
| Liquidity Risks | Pulls accelerate outflows; drags slow inflows |
| Borrowing Approaches | Passive vs active |
Key Takeaways
- Working capital must balance liquidity with efficiency.
- Conservative vs aggressive WC approaches affect risk/return tradeoffs.
- Credit terms (2/10 net 40) heavily influence payable strategy.
- Liquidity analysis focuses on ratios + cash flow behavior.
- Factoring increases liquidity but at a cost.
- Short-term funding strategies must avoid rollover risk.
LM6: Cost of Capital – Foundational Topics
Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC)
WACC = the firm’s overall required return, used as the discount rate for average-risk projects.
Where:
- = weights of debt, preferred stock, equity
- = required returns (cost of debt, preferred, equity)
- (1 – t) = tax shield on interest
Key Rules for WACC
✔ Use market values, not book values
✔ WACC represents the return for the average project
✔ For riskier projects, increase the discount rate
✔ For safer projects, decrease the discount rate
Common Mistakes
❌ Using coupon rate instead of YTM
❌ Using book values instead of market values
❌ Using the same WACC for all projects regardless of risk
Analogy
Think of WACC as a smoothie made of debt, equity, and preferred stock. The flavor (required return) depends on how much of each ingredient is in the mix.
Cost of Debt (rd)
The return lenders demand.
Two Methods to Estimate Cost of Debt
1. Yield-to-Maturity (YTM) Approach
Use the bond’s market yield, not the coupon rate.
Common mistake:
Using the coupon rate, which represents historical cost, not current required return.
2. Debt-Rating Approach
- Used when yield is not observable
- Look at similarly rated corporate bonds in the market
- Take average yield for the firm’s rating category
Cost of Preferred Stock (rp )
Dividend / current price
Tax note:
Taxes do not affect preferred stock cost because preferred dividends are not tax-deductible.
Cost of Equity (re)
1. CAPM (Capital Asset Pricing Model)
Where:
- r = risk-free rate
- = market risk premium
- = measure of systematic risk
2. Bond-Yield + Risk Premium Method
Useful when CAPM inputs are noisy.
Beta Estimation
Beta measures a firm’s systematic (market) risk.
Higher beta → higher market sensitivity → higher required return.
For Public Companies
Run regression:
- Beta = slope of regression line
- If β = 3 → stock moves 3% for every 1% in market
Adjusted Beta
Pulls raw beta toward 1 (market tendency).
Factors affecting beta estimation
- Index selected
- Return interval (daily / monthly / annual)
- Time horizon
Private / Thinly-Traded Companies
Use comparable companies.
Step 1: Un-lever the peer company’s beta
Peer beta (levered) is affected by peer debt.
To strip out peer leverage:
Step 2: Re-lever beta for the target firm
Apply target firm’s capital structure:
Analogy:
Unlevering and relevering beta is like removing someone’s backpack weight and then adding your own to measure their true running speed.
Flotation Costs
Fees paid to investment banks when raising capital.
✔ Do NOT include flotation costs in WACC
❌ Some candidates adjust cost of equity or cost of debt — WRONG
✔ Include flotation costs only in the initial cash outflow of a project
Summary Table
| Topic | Key Points |
|---|---|
| WACC Formula | Weighted average of debt, equity, preferred; use market weights |
| Cost of Debt | Use YTM or debt-rating approach; coupon ≠ cost |
| Cost of Equity | Use CAPM or Bond Yield + RP |
| Beta Estimation | Regression for public firms; comparables for private firms |
| Unlevering Beta | Removes effect of peer leverage |
| Relevering Beta | Applies target firm’s leverage |
| Flotation Costs | Only included in initial cost, not discount rate |
Key Takeaways
- WACC is the discount rate for average-risk projects.
- Use market values for capital structure weights.
- Debt has a tax shield → use rd(1−t).
- Cost of equity typically highest, because equity holders take the most risk.
- Beta measures systematic risk, not total risk.
- Unlever and relever beta when evaluating private firms.
- Never include flotation costs in WACC — only in initial project cash flows.
LM7: Capital Structure
Capital Structure:
The mix of debt and equity a company uses to finance its operations.
Objective:
Find the mix that minimizes WACC and maximizes firm value.
Internal Factors Influencing Capital Structure
1. Business Model & Asset Characteristics
Types of Assets (affects ability to borrow)
- Tangible assets: safer collateral → support more debt
- Intangible assets: less collateral value
- Fungible assets: can be easily substituted (one dollar = another)
- Non-fungible assets: unique (art) → hard to collateralize
- Liquid assets: easily sold → increase borrowing capacity
Asset Ownership
- Asset-heavy firms:
- Many assets on the balance sheet
- Easily used as collateral → can support more debt
- Asset-light firms:
- Outsource or rent assets
- Lower operating leverage → lower business risk → can support more financial leverage
Analogy:
Assets are your home’s value when applying for a mortgage — more assets → more borrowing power.
2. Existing Leverage & Financial Strength
Companies consider:
- Liquidity ratios
- Profitability ratios
- Leverage ratios
- Interest coverage
Explanation:
A company already heavily leveraged will hesitate to add more debt to avoid distress.
3. Corporate Tax Rate
- Interest is tax deductible
- Higher tax rate → larger tax shield → more incentive to use debt
4. Policies and Guidelines
Companies set internal rules, such as:
- Debt/equity < 1
- Debt ≤ 25% of capital
- Debt/EBITDA < 2×
- Based on covenants, rating agency thresholds, or index requirements
5. Company Life Stage
- Startup: unstable cash flows → difficult to issue debt
- Growth: improving access
- Mature: predictable cash flows → highest ability to borrow
External Factors Influencing Capital Structure
1. Market Conditions
- Cost of debt = risk-free rate + credit spread
- Recessions → wider credit spreads → more expensive debt
2. Regulatory Constraints
Some industries have:
- Solvency requirements
- Pricing rules
3. Industry / Peer Norms
Firms resemble peers due to:
- Similar business risk
- Similar asset structure
Capital Structure Across the Company Life Cycle
- Startup → Low leverage (unstable CF)
- Growth → Moderate leverage
- Mature → Higher leverage
Exceptions
- Capital intensive (airlines):
High leverage in all stages; assets are valuable collateral. - Cyclical industries:
Limited debt due to volatile CF. - Capital-light industries (software):
Low leverage, high cash.
Modigliani–Miller Propositions (MM Theory)
MM helps explain how capital structure affects firm value.
MM Proposition I — NO TAXES
Value of a firm is unaffected by capital structure.
Assumptions:
- Homogeneous expectations
- Perfect capital markets
- Borrowing/lending at risk-free rate
- No agency costs
- Financing decisions do not affect investments
Analogy:
Rearranging pieces of a pizza doesn’t change the size of the pizza.
MM Proposition II — NO TAXES
Capital structure changes who gets paid, but overall WACC remains constant.
As debt increases:
- increases (equity becomes riskier)
- More weight on cheaper debt
- Net effect: WACC stays the same
MM Proposition I — WITH TAXES
Debt adds value due to the tax shield:
Where t = tax rate and D = debt level.
MM Proposition II — WITH TAXES
WACC decreases as leverage increases:
Debt becomes even cheaper after tax adjustment.
Cost of Financial Distress
Why don’t firms take on unlimited debt?
Because higher debt → higher expected cost of:
- Bankruptcy
- Distress events
This offsets the tax benefits of debt.
Analogy:
Borrowing too much is like loading a truck beyond capacity — eventually it breaks down.
Target / Optimal Capital Structure
The structure where:
- Firm value is maximized
- WACC is minimized
Static Trade-Off Theory
Goal: Choose D/E that maximizes
Calculating Capital Structure
Use market values of debt and equity.
Why sometimes book values are used:
- Market values volatile
- Managers focus on capital invested rather than market perception
- Third-parties may rely on book values
- Financing decisions depend on conditions (opportunistic)
Pecking Order Theory
Managers prefer financing that sends the least negative signal:
- Internal funds first
- Debt second
- Equity last
Explanation:
Issuing equity may signal shares are overvalued → negative reaction.
Competing Stakeholder Interests & Agency Costs
Managers (Agents) vs Owners (Principals)
Managers want high compensation; owners want firm value maximized.
Agency Costs: arise from these conflicts.
Free Cash Flow Hypothesis (FCF)
More debt → forces managers to use cash efficiently (must make payments).
Creditors vs Shareholders
- Creditors want: low risk, low debt
- Shareholders want: higher leverage for higher returns
Board of Directors vs Managers
- Equity compensation aligns incentives
- But stock options can incentivize:
- Share buybacks
- Reduced dividends
(to boost option value)
Key Summary
| Topic | Key Points |
|---|---|
| Internal Factors | Assets, leverage, taxes, policies, life stage |
| External Factors | Market conditions, regulations, peer leverage |
| MM (No Taxes) | Capital structure irrelevant |
| MM (With Taxes) | Debt adds value via tax shield |
| Financial Distress | Limits use of debt |
| Trade-Off Theory | Choose D/E that maximizes firm value |
| Pecking Order | Internal → debt → equity |
| Agency Conflicts | Managers, creditors, shareholders, boards |
Key Takeaways
- Optimal capital structure minimizes WACC and maximizes firm value.
- Tangible & liquid assets increase borrowing capacity.
- High tax rates → stronger incentives to use debt.
- According to MM with taxes, more debt increases firm value (up to a point).
- Financial distress costs stop firms from using too much debt.
- Market values should be used for capital structure weights.
- Pecking Order Theory explains why firms prefer internal → debt → equity financing.
- Agency issues influence capital structure decisions.
LM8: Measures of Leverage
What is Leverage
Leverage = the amount of fixed costs a company uses
→ Either operating fixed costs or financial fixed costs (interest)
Why it matters:
- Higher leverage → earnings more volatile
- Small change in sales → large change in profit
- Higher volatility → higher risk → higher cost of capital
Analogy:
Leverage is like skiing downhill with stiffer boots — small movements create big effects. Great if controlled, dangerous if not.
Key Risk Concepts
Financial Risk
Risk from using debt (interest obligations).
Sales Risk
Variability in profitability caused by uncertain prices or sales volume.
Operating Risk
Risk arising from fixed operating costs (rent, salaried labor, depreciation).
Business Risk
Analogy:
Business risk = the roughness of the road, while financial risk = the amount of weight in the car.
Types of Leverage
1. Degree of Operating Leverage (DOL)
Measures operating risk
DOL tells you:
- How sensitive EBIT is to changes in sales
- How many fixed operating costs the firm has
If fixed costs removed → DOL = 1 (no operating leverage)
CFA Formula Version:
Analogy:
Operating leverage is like the gear in a car — higher gear amplifies speed changes.
2. Degree of Financial Leverage (DFL)
Measures financial risk
DFL tells you:
- How sensitive Net Income is to changes in EBIT
- How much debt the firm carries
Analogy:
Financial leverage is like borrowing money to invest — gains are amplified but so are losses.
3. Degree of Total Leverage (DTL)
The combined effect of operating + financial leverage
Interpretation:
How sensitive Net Income is to changes in Sales.
Analogy:
DTL is the overall amplification — like turning up both the volume (operating leverage) and the bass boost (financial leverage) on a speaker.
Effects of Financial Leverage
Higher financial leverage → higher ROE
Why?
- After interest is paid, remaining earnings belong to shareholders
- More debt → fewer shareholders (lower equity base)
- Income spread over fewer owners → higher ROE
BUT:
Higher financial leverage also increases probability of bankruptcy.
Break-Even Quantity
Break-even quantity = number of units that must be sold so that net income = 0
Contribution Margin
This represents how much each unit contributes to covering fixed costs.
Break-Even Formula
Analogy:
Break-even is like filling a bucket with a hole at the bottom (fixed costs). Each cup of water (unit sold) fills it a little until it finally reaches the top.
Summary Table
| Concept | What It Measures | CFA Formula | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| DOL | Operating leverage (fixed operating costs) | %ΔEBIT / %ΔSales | Higher DOL → EBIT more sensitive to sales |
| DFL | Financial leverage (debt level) | %ΔNI / %ΔEBIT | Higher DFL → NI more sensitive to EBIT |
| DTL | Total leverage | DOL × DFL | Total sensitivity of NI to sales |
| Financial Risk | Debt-related risk | — | More debt ↑ financial risk |
| Operating Risk | Fixed-cost structure risk | — | More fixed costs ↑ operating risk |
| Break-Even Quantity | Sales needed for NI = 0 | Fixed Costs / (Price – VC) | Higher fixed costs → higher break-even |
Key Takeaways
- Leverage increases earnings volatility and therefore risk.
- Operating leverage comes from fixed operating costs, financial leverage from debt.
- Higher leverage → higher sensitivity of profits to changes in sales.
- DOL, DFL, and DTL quantify how risks flow through the income statement.
- Financial leverage can increase ROE, but also financial distress.
- Break-even analysis helps managers evaluate cost structures and risk exposure.
